Research Focus
Ethical & Trustworthy AI for Critical Environments
I design and govern AI systems deployed in high-impact sectors, healthcare, cybersecurity, and finance, where regulatory exposure, systemic risk, and public trust intersect.
​
My work integrates academic research with executive advisory to operationalize:
​
AI governance frameworks grounded in Accountability, Responsibility, and Transparency (ART)
Systematic bias detection and mitigation mechanisms
Regulatory alignment with EU AI Act and sector-specific standards
Human-centered AI architectures that sustain institutional trust
​
Across policy advisory, funded research leadership, and AI system auditing, every engagement applies structured oversight, traceability, and evidence-based risk management.
Dr. Vourganas
Designing and governing AI systems in healthcare, cybersecurity, and finance, where regulatory exposure, operational risk, and public trust intersect.
Organizations deploy AI faster than they can supervise it.
I build the governance architecture that makes AI operational, compliant, and accountable in production environments.​
​
AI maturity is not about models.
It is about oversight, traceability, and executive responsibility.
Research in Action
Real-World Applications of Ethical AI.
AI systems operating in high-stakes environments cannot rely on performance metrics alone. They require embedded governance, structural oversight, and institutional accountability.
​
This work integrates ethical and regulatory frameworks directly into system design, deployment, and monitoring, ensuring transparency, traceability, and auditability across the full AI lifecycle.
​
In defense, healthcare, and finance, system failures are not technical inconveniences; they are material risk events with human, financial, and societal consequences. Governance must therefore be engineered as infrastructure, not treated as policy.
​
Below are examples of how AI oversight is operationalized in practice:
Cybersecurity & Defense
​
AI systems operating in national security and critical infrastructure environments require structured oversight, not just performance optimization.
​
I design governance architectures for AI-driven threat detection and real-time decision-support systems, ensuring:
​
Human-in-the-loop accountability in high-risk operational contexts
Explainability mechanisms for incident traceability
Risk classification aligned with regulatory and defense compliance standards
Controlled autonomy under defined escalation protocols
​
In critical environments, AI performance alone is insufficient.
Operational legitimacy depends on oversight, traceability, and institutional responsibility.
Healthcare
​
​Trustworthy AI for Clinical Environments
AI systems supporting clinical decision-making operate under strict safety, liability, and regulatory constraints.
​
I design governance and validation frameworks for ethical-by-design AI in digital health and patient-care systems, ensuring:
​
Transparent model reasoning in high-stakes clinical contexts
Structured human oversight and escalation protocols
Compliance alignment with medical device and AI regulatory standards
Continuous post-deployment monitoring and auditability
​
In healthcare, AI performance is secondary to safety, traceability, and clinical accountabilit
Finance & Risk
​
AI systems deployed in regulated financial environments must withstand supervisory scrutiny, model risk review, and audit traceability.
I design governance and explainability frameworks for credit scoring, risk assessment, and decision-automation systems, ensuring:
​
Documented model accountability and traceable decision pathways
Alignment with supervisory expectations and compliance requirements
Structured bias mitigation and fairness validation
Audit-ready lifecycle governance from design to deployment
​​
In finance, explainability is not a feature.
It is a regulatory requirement.
Why These Domains Matter Together:​
​
Across defense, healthcare, and finance, AI systems operate under material risk and sustained regulatory scrutiny.
​
In these environments, system failures are not operational inconveniences, they carry human, financial, and institutional consequences.
​
Trustworthiness is not an abstract principle.
It is a structural requirement.
​
My work integrates governance-by-design across high-stakes sectors, ensuring that AI systems:
​
Maintain traceable accountability
Operate under defined oversight structures
Align with regulatory and supervisory expectations
Sustain institutional legitimacy in complex environments
​
The unifying mission is clear:
To ensure that technological capability does not outpace ethical responsibility, and that innovation remains operationally accountable.
Ethical AI in Motion
From governance principles to applied systems.
This demonstration showcases a real-time bias detection and fairness auditing interface developed as an applied governance prototype.
Built to simulate continuous oversight in regulated environments, the system illustrates how:
Model decisions can be monitored for bias in real time
Explainability outputs can support traceable accountability
Compliance logic can be embedded into decision workflows
While developed as a functional prototype, the architecture reflects production-oriented governance design, where ethical oversight is not external, but embedded within the system lifecycle.
Ethical AI must move beyond policy statements.
It must become operational.
Applications of Machine Learning in Cyber Security: A Review
​
Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy (MDPI), 2024​
​
A structured narrative review of machine learning and AI use in cybersecurity, examining the current research landscape, key challenges in dataset quality and preprocessing, and critical gaps in real-world applicability. The paper highlights how disparate datasets, inconsistent feature representation, and methodological variation impact the reliability and transparency of AI-assisted security systems, insights that directly feed into frameworks for trustworthy and auditable AI governance.
​​
​
​
Responsible AI for Home-Based Rehabilitation
​
Sensors (MDPI), 2021
​​​​
This study presents an ethical AI framework for home-based rehabilitation systems that balance effectiveness with patient autonomy and privacy. It introduces a hybrid machine learning model designed to support personalized digital care while adhering to principled design constraints, demonstrating how ethically grounded AI can enhance clinical decision processes without intrusive monitoring.
The work reflects core governance themes, safety by design, transparent model reasoning, and human-centered oversight, providing a foundation for trustworthy AI systems in regulated health environments.
​